OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [PATCH 0/59] Cleanup sysctl
Re: [PATCH 0/59] Cleanup sysctl [message #17266 is a reply to message #17149] Wed, 17 January 2007 18:10 Go to previous message
dev is currently offline  dev
Messages: 1693
Registered: September 2005
Location: Moscow
Senior Member

Eric, really good job!

Patches: 1-13, 15-24, 26-32, 34-44, 46-49, 52-55, 57 (all except below)
Acked-By: Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org>

14/59 - minor (extra space)
25/59 - minor note	
33/59 - not sorted sysctl IDs
45/59 - typo
50/59 - copyright/file note
51/59 - copyright/file name/kconfig option notes

56,58,59/59 - will review tomorrow

another issue I have to think over is removal of de->owner.
Alexey Dobriyan has sent recently patching fixing /proc <-> modules refcounting.
I guess w/o these patches your changes are not safe if proc_handler or strategy
are functions from the module.

Thanks,
Kirill

> There has not been much maintenance on sysctl in years, and as a result is
> there is a lot to do to allow future interesting work to happen, and being
> ambitious I'm trying to do it all at once :)
> 
> The patches in this series fall into several general categories.
> 
> - Removal of useless attempts to override the standard sysctls
> 
> - Registers of sysctl numbers in sysctl.h so someone else does not use
>   the magic number and conflict.
> 
> - C99 conversions so it becomes possible to change the layout of 
>   struct ctl_table without breaking everything.
> 
> - Removal of useless claims of module ownership, in the proc dir entries
> 
> - Removal of sys_sysctl support where people had used conflicting sysctl
>   numbers. Trying to break glibc or other applications by changing the
>   ABI is not cool.  9 instances of this in the kernel seems a little
>   extreme.
> 
> - General enhancements when I got the junk I could see out.
> 
> Odds are I missed something, most of the cleanups are simply a result of
> me working on the sysctl core and glancing at the users and going: What?
> 
> Eric
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers@lists.osdl.org
> https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: gentoo baselayout 1.13 openvz modifications
Next Topic: [PATCH] :EXT[3, 4] jbd layer function called instead of fs specific one
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Jul 23 00:56:41 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.11355 seconds