Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at> writes:

> I'd prefer pid_n{s,amespace} too, as it resembles the
> function more closely ...

Yes either pid_ns or pspace.

task_ns is just wrong.

Anyway from what I can tell we are getting a little ahead of ourselves
and not handing the fundamentals.  We haven't killed the pid_t's
yet and that is the hard part.

Eric
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers