OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [RFC][PATCH 0/15] Pid namespaces
Re: [PATCH 9/15] Move alloc_pid() after the namespace is cloned [message #15422 is a reply to message #15403] Mon, 30 July 2007 23:43 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Sukadev Bhattiprolu is currently offline  Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Messages: 413
Registered: August 2006
Senior Member
Pavel Emelianov [xemul@openvz.org] wrote:
| Oleg Nesterov wrote:
| >On 07/26, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
| >>This is a fix for Sukadev's patch that moved the alloc_pid() call from
| >>do_fork() into copy_process().
| >
| >... and this patch changes almost every line from Sukadev's patch.
|
| It does. My bad :( I have reviewed Suka's patch badly and was sure it
| puts the alloc_pid() right where we need this.

I should have reviewed Pavel's closely too. Sorry.

|
| >Sorry gents, but isn't it better to ask Andrew to drop that patch
| >(which is quite useless by itself), and send a new one which incorporates
| >all necessary changes? Imho, it would be much easier to understand.
|
| Hm... Maybe it's better to ask him to fold these patches together?

I think so, but even dropping my patch is fine with me.

|
| >>@@ -1406,7 +1422,13 @@ long do_fork(unsigned long clone_flags,
| >> if (!IS_ERR(p)) {
| >> struct completion vfork;
| >>
| >>- nr = pid_nr(task_pid(p));
| >>+ /*
| >>+ * this is enough to call pid_nr_ns here, but this if
| >>+ * improves optimisation of regular fork()
| >>+ */
| >>+ nr = (clone_flags & CLONE_NEWPID) ?
| >>+ task_pid_nr_ns(p, current->nsproxy->pid_ns) :
| >>+ task_pid_vnr(p);
| >
| >Shouldn't we do the same for CLONE_PARENT_SETTID in copy_process() ?
| >Otherwise *parent_tidptr may have a wrong value which doesn't match
| >to what fork() returns.
|
| Oops. We should. Thanks :)
|
| >Oleg.
|
| Thanks,
| Pavel
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: [RFC, PATCH] handle the multi-threaded init's exit() properly
Next Topic: [PATCH 0/14] sysfs cleanups
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Sep 06 15:44:51 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.15162 seconds