Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [RFC][PATCH 0/15] Pid namespaces
Re: [PATCH 5/15] Introduce struct upid [message #15398 is a reply to message #15374] |
Mon, 30 July 2007 05:58   |
Pavel Emelianov
Messages: 1149 Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 07/26, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> --- linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1.orig/include/linux/pid.h 2007-07-26 16:34:45.000000000 +0400
>> +++ linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1-7/include/linux/pid.h 2007-07-26 16:36:37.000000000 +0400
>> @@ -40,15 +40,21 @@ enum pid_type
>> * processes.
>> */
>>
>> -struct pid
>> -{
>> - atomic_t count;
>> +struct upid {
>> /* Try to keep pid_chain in the same cacheline as nr for find_pid */
>> int nr;
>> + struct pid_namespace *ns;
>> struct hlist_node pid_chain;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct pid
>> +{
>> + atomic_t count;
>> /* lists of tasks that use this pid */
>> struct hlist_head tasks[PIDTYPE_MAX];
>> struct rcu_head rcu;
>> + int level;
>> + struct upid numbers[1];
>> };
>
> Well. Definitely, the kernel can't be compiled with this patch applied,
> this seems to be against the rules...
Yes. U forgot to mention, that this patchset is git-bisect-not-safe :)
I sent the safe split earlier, but it was harder to make and understand,
so I decided not to waste the time and sent a badly-split set just to get
comments about the approach. The ways a big patch is split wouldn't affect
the comments about the ideas, bugs, etc.
> So. The task has a single (PIDTYPE_MAX) pid no matter how many namespaces
> can see it, and "struct pid" has an array of numbers for each namespace.
>
> Still I can't understand why do we need upid->ns, can't we kill it?
> Suppose we add "struct pid_namespace *parent_ns" to "struct pid_namespace",
> init_pid_ns.parent_ns == NULL.
We already have it :)
> Now,
>
> struct upid {
> int nr;
> struct hlist_node pid_chain;
> };
>
> struct pid
> {
> atomic_t count;
> struct hlist_head tasks[PIDTYPE_MAX];
> struct rcu_head rcu;
> struct pid_namespace *active_ns;
> struct upid numbers[0];
> };
>
> We populate pid->numbers in "reverse" order, so that pid->numbers[0] lives
> in pid->active_ns.
>
> Now, for example,
>
> void free_pid(struct pid *pid)
> {
> struct pid_namespace *ns;
> unsigned long flags;
> int i;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&pidmap_lock, flags);
> for (i = 0, ns = pid->active_ns; ns; i++, ns = ns->parent_ns)
> hlist_del_rcu(&pid->numbers[i].pid_chain);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pidmap_lock, flags);
>
> for (i = 0, ns = pid->active_ns; ns; i++, ns = ns->parent_ns)
> free_pidmap(ns, pid->numbers[i].nr);
>
> call_rcu(&pid->rcu, delayed_put_pid);
> }
>
> Possible?
Possible, but how will
struct pid *find_pid_nr_ns(int nr, struct pid_namespace *ns);
look then? The only way (I see) is to make
hlist_for_each_entry (upid, ...)
if (upid->nr == nr && upid->ns == ns)
return container_of(upid, struct pid, ...)
> Oleg.
Thanks,
Pavel
|
|
|
 |
|
[RFC][PATCH 0/15] Pid namespaces
|
 |
|
[PATCH 1/15] Move exit_task_namespaces()
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 1/15] Move exit_task_namespaces()
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 1/15] Move exit_task_namespaces()
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 1/15] Move exit_task_namespaces()
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 1/15] Move exit_task_namespaces()
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 1/15] Move exit_task_namespaces()
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 1/15] Move exit_task_namespaces()
By: dev on Thu, 26 July 2007 16:59
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 1/15] Move exit_task_namespaces()
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 1/15] Move exit_task_namespaces()
By: xemul on Fri, 27 July 2007 06:38
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 1/15] Move exit_task_namespaces()
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 1/15] Move exit_task_namespaces()
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 1/15] Move exit_task_namespaces()
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 1/15] Move exit_task_namespaces()
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 1/15] Move exit_task_namespaces()
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 1/15] Move exit_task_namespaces()
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 1/15] Move exit_task_namespaces()
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 1/15] Move exit_task_namespaces()
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 1/15] Move exit_task_namespaces()
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 1/15] Move exit_task_namespaces()
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 1/15] Move exit_task_namespaces()
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 1/15] Move exit_task_namespaces()
|
 |
|
[PATCH 2/15] Introduce MS_KERNMOUNT flag
|
 |
|
[PATCH 3/15] kern_siginfo helper
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 3/15] kern_siginfo helper
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 3/15] kern_siginfo helper
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 3/15] kern_siginfo helper
|
 |
|
[PATCH 4/15] Make proc_flust_task() flush entries from multiple proc trees
|
 |
|
[PATCH 5/15] Introduce struct upid
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 5/15] Introduce struct upid
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 5/15] Introduce struct upid
|
 |
|
[PATCH 6/15] Make alloc_pid(), free_pid() and put_pid() work with struct upid
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 6/15] Make alloc_pid(), free_pid() and put_pid() work with struct upid
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 6/15] Make alloc_pid(), free_pid() and put_pid() work with struct upid
|
 |
|
[PATCH 7/15] Helpers to obtain pid numbers
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 7/15] Helpers to obtain pid numbers
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 7/15] Helpers to obtain pid numbers
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 7/15] Helpers to obtain pid numbers
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 7/15] Helpers to obtain pid numbers
|
 |
|
[PATCH 8/15] Helpers to find the task by its numerical ids
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 8/15] Helpers to find the task by its numerical ids
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 8/15] Helpers to find the task by its numerical ids
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 8/15] Helpers to find the task by its numerical ids
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 8/15] Helpers to find the task by its numerical ids
|
 |
|
[PATCH 9/15] Move alloc_pid() after the namespace is cloned
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 9/15] Move alloc_pid() after the namespace is cloned
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 9/15] Move alloc_pid() after the namespace is cloned
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 9/15] Move alloc_pid() after the namespace is cloned
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 9/15] Move alloc_pid() after the namespace is cloned
|
 |
|
[PATCH 10/15] Make each namespace has its own proc tree
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 10/15] Make each namespace has its own proc tree
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 10/15] Make each namespace has its own proc tree
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 10/15] Make each namespace has its own proc tree
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 10/15] Make each namespace has its own proc tree
|
 |
|
[PATCH 11/15] Signal semantics
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 11/15] Signal semantics
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 11/15] Signal semantics
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 11/15] Signal semantics
By: serue on Fri, 27 July 2007 19:59
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 11/15] Signal semantics
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 11/15] Signal semantics
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 11/15] Signal semantics
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 11/15] Signal semantics
By: serue on Wed, 01 August 2007 16:13
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 11/15] Signal semantics
By: dev on Thu, 02 August 2007 08:35
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 11/15] Signal semantics
By: serue on Thu, 02 August 2007 20:09
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 11/15] Signal semantics
|
 |
|
[PATCH 12/15] Miscelaneous stuff for pid namespaces
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 12/15] Miscelaneous stuff for pid namespaces
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 12/15] Miscelaneous stuff for pid namespaces
|
 |
|
[PATCH 13/15] Clone the pid namespace
|
 |
|
[PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death
By: dev on Thu, 02 August 2007 08:37
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death
By: serue on Thu, 02 August 2007 19:13
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death
|
 |
|
[PATCH 15/15] Hooks over the code to show correct values to user
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 15/15] Hooks over the code to show correct values to user
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 15/15] Hooks over the code to show correct values to user
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 15/15] Hooks over the code to show correct values to user
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 15/15] Hooks over the code to show correct values to user
|
 |
|
Re: [PATCH 15/15] Hooks over the code to show correct values to user
|
 |
|
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/15] Pid namespaces
|
 |
|
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/15] Pid namespaces
|
 |
|
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/15] Pid namespaces
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Sep 06 15:49:09 GMT 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.11609 seconds
|