OpenVZ Forum: Support » *SOLVED* VEs with different subnets

Home » General » Support » *SOLVED* VEs with different subnets

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: VEs with different subnets [message #14585 is a reply to message #14542]

Mon, 02 July 2007 21:19

ugo123
Messages: 22
Registered: June 2007

Junior Member

And I have to remember that I only have one interface and my goal is actually not to waste a public IP on the HN since they don't need one at all, they just need an internet access for the upgrade, and that's where my NAT gateway 10.1.1.1 takes place to save some IPs.

After reading the route manual, that's probably why I've got the "RTNETLINK answers: Network is unreachable" message because the program doesn't see any DIRECT interface that knows how to reach the ISP's real gateway.

Actually, after thinking about it.... I don't see how this is do-able at all with "classical routing", because even if we succeed, the ISP will surely filters the "martians" source IP (10.1.x.x) from its routing table, so the packets will be null-routed anyway... and the thing will be pointless in that case Sad

So that's why I think that I really need the veth to get the thing working...because from what I see the veth looks like a lot like the things I was able to do with Xen networking part.... but still I can't get it work (at least by by doing the things explained on the wiki)

Thanks,

Ugo

[Updated on: Mon, 02 July 2007 21:20]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		SOLVED VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Sun, 01 July 2007 23:25
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: dev on Mon, 02 July 2007 07:29
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Mon, 02 July 2007 08:31
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: dev on Mon, 02 July 2007 07:38
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Mon, 02 July 2007 08:36
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: dev on Mon, 02 July 2007 08:52
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Mon, 02 July 2007 09:13
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: khorenko on Mon, 02 July 2007 11:32
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Mon, 02 July 2007 12:01
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Mon, 02 July 2007 12:19
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: khorenko on Mon, 02 July 2007 16:08
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Mon, 02 July 2007 17:17
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Mon, 02 July 2007 20:13
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: khorenko on Tue, 03 July 2007 07:20
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Tue, 03 July 2007 09:25
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Tue, 03 July 2007 09:26
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: khorenko on Tue, 03 July 2007 10:28
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: dev on Tue, 03 July 2007 10:31
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Tue, 03 July 2007 12:04
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Tue, 03 July 2007 10:41
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Mon, 02 July 2007 21:19
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: emkravts on Tue, 03 July 2007 11:45
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Tue, 03 July 2007 12:07
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: dev on Tue, 03 July 2007 12:08
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Tue, 03 July 2007 12:39
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Tue, 03 July 2007 12:59
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: emkravts on Tue, 03 July 2007 13:09
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Tue, 03 July 2007 14:48
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: n00b_admin on Mon, 09 July 2007 12:35
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Mon, 09 July 2007 12:51
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: n00b_admin on Mon, 09 July 2007 13:40
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: khorenko on Sun, 15 July 2007 16:31

Previous Topic:	RESOLVED Solaris 10 Template
Next Topic:	BUG REPORTED Migration problem with 2.6.18-028stab035

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Aug 07 09:39:34 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05181 seconds