OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Users » Network slowness
Re: Network slowness [message #14569 is a reply to message #14568] Mon, 02 July 2007 15:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
dev is currently offline  dev
Messages: 1693
Registered: September 2005
Location: Moscow
Senior Member
It is obvious from this output, that this VE requires much more resources then
available for it.

Check whether failcnt columnt counters are increasing over the time
to understand what resource shortages your VEs do experience.
>From this output it is clear that it has shortages of
kmemsize, tcprcvbuf and numfile resources.

You can increase those using the command:
# vzctl set <VEID> --<resource> <new-value>

(also check for vzsplit tool)

Thanks,
Kirill


Kai Hendry wrote:
> On 7/2/07, Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru> wrote:
>
>>Check /proc/user_beancounters limits (post it here).
>>It can be due to a limit network buffers allowed.
>
>
> Attached.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------
>
> Version: 2.5
> uid resource held maxheld barrier limit failcnt
> 100: kmemsize 884604 2324396 2752512 2936012 175
> lockedpages 0 0 32 32 0
> privvmpages 36369 56976 262144 262144 0
> shmpages 640 1328 8192 8192 0
> dummy 0 0 0 0 0
> numproc 27 36 65 65 0
> physpages 4147 9574 0 2147483647 0
> vmguarpages 0 0 65536 65536 0
> oomguarpages 4147 9574 6144 2147483647 0
> numtcpsock 3 6 80 80 0
> numflock 1 7 100 110 0
> numpty 1 2 16 16 0
> numsiginfo 0 13 256 256 0
> tcpsndbuf 2220 59940 319488 524288 0
> tcprcvbuf 0 277500 319488 524288 6502
> othersockbuf 8880 30304 132096 336896 0
> dgramrcvbuf 0 8364 132096 132096 0
> numothersock 8 18 80 80 0
> dcachesize 0 0 1048576 1097728 0
> numfile 606 860 2048 2048 916
> dummy 0 0 0 0 0
> dummy 0 0 0 0 0
> dummy 0 0 0 0 0
> numiptent 10 10 128 128 0
> 0: kmemsize 35762556 39840332 2147483647 2147483647 0
> lockedpages 0 6 2147483647 2147483647 0
> privvmpages 684068 762359 2147483647 2147483647 0
> shmpages 154094 161420 2147483647 2147483647 0
> dummy 0 0 2147483647 2147483647 0
> numproc 363 416 2147483647 2147483647 0
> physpages 195855 222280 2147483647 2147483647 0
> vmguarpages 0 0 2147483647 2147483647 0
> oomguarpages 299011 319377 2147483647 2147483647 1
> numtcpsock 228 313 2147483647 2147483647 0
> numflock 39 54 2147483647 2147483647 0
> numpty 19 23 2147483647 2147483647 0
> numsiginfo 10 23 2147483647 2147483647 0
> tcpsndbuf 2824620 3521872 2147483647 2147483647 0
> tcprcvbuf 7400004 11458836 2147483647 2147483647 0
> othersockbuf 425556 959780 2147483647 2147483647 0
> dgramrcvbuf 31752 47628 2147483647 2147483647 0
> numothersock 274 331 2147483647 2147483647 0
> dcachesize 0 0 2147483647 2147483647 0
> numfile 64362 65677 2147483647 2147483647 0
> dummy 0 0 2147483647 2147483647 0
> dummy 0 0 2147483647 2147483647 0
> dummy 0 0 2147483647 2147483647 0
> numiptent 17 17 2147483647 2147483647 0

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: CPUUNITS (yeah...yet another question...*SIGH*)
Next Topic: IPv6 on veth interface (almost)SOLVED
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Apr 19 14:25:21 GMT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.49598 seconds
Powered by FUDforum Powered by Virtuozzo Containers