OpenVZ Forum: Support » *SOLVED* VEs with different subnets

Home » General » Support » *SOLVED* VEs with different subnets

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: VEs with different subnets [message #14559 is a reply to message #14558]

Mon, 02 July 2007 12:01

ugo123
Messages: 22
Registered: June 2007

Junior Member

finist wrote on Mon, 02 July 2007 07:32

Hello, Ugo.

just a small question - did you try to use venet and just configure node as simple as you did on your Xen node?
i mean just set a private IP on a Hardware Node (eth0) and set a public IP for a VE? (vzctl set $VEID --ipadd $PUBLIC_IP --save)

i just checked such a simple configuration and it seems to me - it works fine.
Could you please check it? If it won't work, could you please post
- ip a l
- ip r l
- vzctl exec $VEID ip a l
- vzctl exec $VEID ip r l
- the command that didn't work?

Yes of course, that's how I've tested OpenVZ at home and everything worked fine (but I was on the same private subnet).
And of course, I've tried the same thing at the datacenter with the public IP directly.... but it failed.

Just give me 10 minutes, the time for me to delete everything and to create a fresh new VE and everything.... and I will post everything that you want.

I'll create a Fedora VE this time, because the Debian VE (from the templates provided by openvz.org) doesn't have the ip-tools suite.... and since I don't have Internet... I can't apt-get install it :/

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		SOLVED VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Sun, 01 July 2007 23:25
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: dev on Mon, 02 July 2007 07:29
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Mon, 02 July 2007 08:31
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: dev on Mon, 02 July 2007 07:38
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Mon, 02 July 2007 08:36
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: dev on Mon, 02 July 2007 08:52
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Mon, 02 July 2007 09:13
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: khorenko on Mon, 02 July 2007 11:32
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Mon, 02 July 2007 12:01
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Mon, 02 July 2007 12:19
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: khorenko on Mon, 02 July 2007 16:08
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Mon, 02 July 2007 17:17
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Mon, 02 July 2007 20:13
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: khorenko on Tue, 03 July 2007 07:20
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Tue, 03 July 2007 09:25
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Tue, 03 July 2007 09:26
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: khorenko on Tue, 03 July 2007 10:28
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: dev on Tue, 03 July 2007 10:31
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Tue, 03 July 2007 12:04
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Tue, 03 July 2007 10:41
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Mon, 02 July 2007 21:19
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: emkravts on Tue, 03 July 2007 11:45
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Tue, 03 July 2007 12:07
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: dev on Tue, 03 July 2007 12:08
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Tue, 03 July 2007 12:39
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Tue, 03 July 2007 12:59
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: emkravts on Tue, 03 July 2007 13:09
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Tue, 03 July 2007 14:48
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: n00b_admin on Mon, 09 July 2007 12:35
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: ugo123 on Mon, 09 July 2007 12:51
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: n00b_admin on Mon, 09 July 2007 13:40
		Re: VEs with different subnets By: khorenko on Sun, 15 July 2007 16:31

Previous Topic:	RESOLVED Solaris 10 Template
Next Topic:	BUG REPORTED Migration problem with 2.6.18-028stab035

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Oct 14 10:58:54 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.08482 seconds