Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [PATCH -mm 1/2] i386: semi-rewrite of PTRACE_PEEKUSR, PTRACE_POKEUSR
| [PATCH -mm 1/2] i386: semi-rewrite of PTRACE_PEEKUSR, PTRACE_POKEUSR [message #14255] |
Wed, 20 June 2007 15:07  |
Alexey Dobriyan
Messages: 195
Registered: August 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Refactor PTRACE_PEEKUSR, PTRACE_POKEUSR implementation on i386.
Ideas and concepts borrowed from utrace patchset by Roland McGrath.
Patch adds only two new concepts: struct ptrace_usr_area and struct regset.
The former describes registers accessible through PTRACE_PEEKUSR,
PTRACE_POKEUSR in generic way. Where it starts, where it ends, if it's a hole
(needed to know when to return 0 and -EIO).
The latter is for abstracting various registers and operations on them
(general-purpose regs, FPU regs, etc).
Unlike utrace patchset, usr_area has direct pointer to correspoding
register set instead of magic number in specific array.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@sw.ru>
---
arch/i386/kernel/ptrace.c | 192 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
include/linux/ptrace.h | 15 +++
kernel/ptrace.c | 42 ++++++++++
3 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -141,6 +141,11 @@ static unsigned long getreg(struct task_struct *child,
return retval;
}
+static struct regset i386_gp_regset = {
+ .getreg = getreg,
+ .setreg = putreg,
+};
+
#define LDT_SEGMENT 4
static unsigned long convert_eip_to_linear(struct task_struct *child, struct pt_regs *regs)
@@ -349,9 +354,103 @@ ptrace_set_thread_area(struct task_struct *child,
return 0;
}
+static unsigned long i386_db_getreg(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr)
+{
+ addr -= offsetof(struct user, u_debugreg);
+ addr >>= 2;
+ BUG_ON(addr > 7);
+ return tsk->thread.debugreg;
+}
+
+static int i386_db_setreg(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr, unsigned long val)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ /*
+ * We need to be very careful here. We implicitly want to modify a
+ * portion of the task_struct, and we have to be selective about what
+ * portions we allow someone to modify.
+ */
+ switch (addr) {
+ case offsetof(struct user, u_debugreg):
+ case offsetof(struct user, u_debugreg):
+ return -EIO;
+ case offsetof(struct user, u_debugreg):
+ case offsetof(struct user, u_debugreg):
+ case offsetof(struct user, u_debugreg):
+ case offsetof(struct user, u_debugreg):
+ if (val > TASK_SIZE - 3)
+ return -EIO;
+ break;
+ case offsetof(struct user, u_debugreg):
+ /*
+ * Sanity-check data. Take one half-byte at once with
+ * check = (val >> (16 + 4*i)) & 0xf. It contains the R/Wi and
+ * LENi bits; bits 0 and 1 are R/Wi, and bits 2 and 3 are LENi.
+ * Given a list of invalid values, we do
+ * mask |= 1 << invalid_value, so that (mask >> check) & 1 is a
+ * correct test for invalid values.
+ *
+ * R/Wi contains the type of the breakpoint / watchpoint, LENi
+ * contains the length of the watched data in the watchpoint
+ * case.
+ *
+ * The invalid values are:
+ * - LENi == 0x10 (undefined), so mask |= 0x0f00.
+ * - R/Wi == 0x10 (break on I/O reads or writes), so
+ * mask |= 0x4444.
+ * - R/Wi == 0x00 && LENi != 0x00, so we have mask |= 0x1110.
+ *
+ * Finally, mask = 0x0f00 | 0x4444 | 0x1110 == 0x5f54.
+ *
+ * See the Intel Manual "System Programming Guide", 15.2.4
+ *
+ * Note that LENi == 0x10 is defined on x86_64 in long mode
+ * (i.e. even for 32-bit userspace software, but 64-bit
+ * kernel), so the x86_64 mask value is 0x5454. See the AMD
+ * manual no. 24593 (AMD64 System Programming)
+ */
+ val &= ~DR_CONTROL_RESERVED;
+ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
+ if ((0x5f54 >> ((val >> (16 + 4 * i)) & 0xf)) & 1)
+ return -EIO;
+ if (val)
+ set_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_DEBUG);
+ else
+ clear_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_DEBUG);
+ break;
+ }
+ addr -= offsetof(struct user, u_debugreg);
+ addr >>= 2;
+ BUG_ON(addr > 7);
+ tsk->thread.debugreg = val;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct regset i386_db_regset = {
+ .getreg = i386_db_getreg,
+ .setreg = i386_db_setreg,
+};
+
+static struct ptrace_usr_area i386_usr_area[] = {
+ {
+ .start = 0,
+ .end = FRAME_SIZE * sizeof(unsigned long),
+ .regset = &i386_gp_regset,
+ }, {
+ .start = FRAME_SIZE * sizeof(unsigned long),
+ .end = offsetof(struct user, u_debugreg),
+ .hole = 1,
+ }, {
+ .start = offsetof(struct user, u_debugreg),
+ .end = offsetof(struct user, u_debugreg),
+ .regset = &i386_db_regset,
+ },
+ {}
+};
+
long arch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, long request, long addr, long data)
{
- struct user * dummy = NULL;
int i, ret;
unsigned long __user *datap = (unsigned long __user *)data;
@@ -363,26 +462,9 @@ long arch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, long request, long addr, long data)
break;
/* read the word at location addr in the USER area. */
- case PTRACE_PEEKUSR: {
- unsigned long tmp;
-
- ret = -EIO;
- if ((addr & 3) || addr < 0 ||
- addr > sizeof(struct user) - 3)
- break;
-
- tmp = 0; /* Default return condition */
- if(addr < FRAME_SIZE*sizeof(long))
- tmp = getreg(child, addr);
- if(addr >= (long) &dummy->u_debugreg &&
- addr <= (long) &dummy->u_debugreg){
- addr -= (long) &dummy->u_debugreg;
- addr = addr >> 2;
- tmp = child->thread.debugreg;
- }
- ret = put_user(tmp, datap);
+ case PTRACE_PEEKUSR:
+ ret = ptrace_peekusr(child, i386_usr_area, addr, data);
break;
- }
/* when I and D space are separate, this will have to be fixed. */
case PTRACE_POKETEXT: /* write the word at location addr. */
@@ -391,74 +473,7 @@ long arch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, long request, long addr, long data)
break;
case PTRACE_POKEUSR: /* write the word at location addr in the USER area */
- ret = -EIO;
- if ((addr & 3) || addr < 0 ||
- addr > sizeof(struct user) - 3)
- break;
-
- if (addr < FRAME_SIZE*sizeof(long)) {
- ret = putreg(child, addr, data);
- break;
- }
- /* We need to be very careful here. We implicitly
- want to modify a portion of the task_struct, and we
- have to be selective about what portions we allow someone
- to modify. */
-
- ret = -EIO;
- if(addr >= (long) &dummy->u_debugreg &&
- addr <= (long) &dummy->u_debugreg){
-
- if(addr == (long) &dummy->u_debugreg) break;
- if(addr == (long) &dummy->u_debugreg) break;
- if(addr < (long) &dummy->u_debugreg &&
- ((unsigned long) data) >= TASK_SIZE-3) break;
-
- /* Sanity-check data. Take one half-byte at once with
- * check = (val >> (16 + 4*i)) & 0xf. It contains the
- * R/Wi and LENi bits; bits 0 and 1 are R/Wi, and bits
- * 2 and 3 are LENi. Given a list of invalid values,
- * we do mask |= 1 << invalid_value, so that
- * (mask >> check) & 1 is a correct test for invalid
- * values.
- *
- * R/Wi contains the type of the breakpoint /
- * watchpoint, LENi contains the length of the watched
- * data in the watchpoint case.
- *
- * The invalid values are:
- * - LENi == 0x10 (undefined), so mask |= 0x0f00.
- * - R/Wi == 0x10 (break on I/O reads or writes), so
- * mask |= 0x4444.
- * - R/Wi == 0x00 && LENi != 0x00, so we have mask |=
- * 0x1110.
- *
- * Finally, mask = 0x0f00 | 0x4444 | 0x1110 == 0x5f54.
- *
- * See the Intel Manual "System Programming Guide",
- * 15.2.4
- *
- * Note that LENi == 0x10 is defined on x86_64 in long
- * mode (i.e. even for 32-bit userspace software, but
- * 64-bit kernel), so the x86_64 mask value is 0x5454.
- * See the AMD manual no. 24593 (AMD64 System
- * Programming)*/
-
- if(addr == (long) &dummy->u_debugreg) {
- data &= ~DR_CONTROL_RESERVED;
- for(i=0; i<4; i++)
- if ((0x5f54 >> ((data >> (16 + 4*i)) & 0xf)) & 1)
- goto out_tsk;
- if (data)
- set_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_DEBUG);
- else
- clear_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_DEBUG);
- }
- addr -= (long) &dummy->u_debugreg;
- addr = addr >> 2;
- child->thread.debugreg[addr] = data;
- ret = 0;
- }
+ ret = ptrace_pokeusr(child, i386_usr_area, addr, data);
break;
case PTRACE_SYSEMU: /* continue and stop at next syscall, which will not be executed */
@@ -613,7 +628,6 @@ long arch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, long request, long addr, long data)
ret = ptrace_request(child, request, addr, data);
break;
}
- out_tsk:
return ret;
}
--- a/include/linux/ptrace.h
+++ b/include/linux/ptrace.h
@@ -113,6 +113,21 @@ static inline void ptrace_unlink(struct task_struct *child)
int generic_ptrace_peekdata(struct task_struct *tsk, long addr, long data);
int generic_ptrace_pokedata(struct task_struct *tsk, long addr, long data);
+struct regset {
+ unsigned long (*getreg)(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr);
+ int (*setreg)(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr, unsigned long val);
+};
+
+struct ptrace_usr_area {
+ long start, end; /* [start, end) */
+ struct regset *regset;
+ /* if set, reads from [start, end) return 0, writes return -EIO */
+ unsigned int hole:1;
+};
+
+int ptrace_peekusr(struct task_struct *tsk, struct ptrace_usr_area *usr_area, long addr, long data);
+int ptrace_pokeusr(struct task_struct *tsk, struct ptrace_usr_area *usr_area, long addr, long data);
+
#ifndef force_successful_syscall_return
/*
* System call handlers that, upon successful completion, need to return a
--- a/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -510,3 +510,45 @@ int generic_ptrace_pokedata(struct task_struct *tsk, long addr, long data)
copied = access_process_vm(tsk, addr, &data, sizeof(data), 1);
return (copied == sizeof(data)) ? 0 : -EIO;
}
+
+int ptrace_peekusr(struct task_struct *tsk, struct ptrace_usr_area *usr_area,
+ long addr, long data)
+{
+ if (addr & (sizeof(unsigned long) - 1))
+ return -EIO;
+
+ wh
...
|
|
|
|
| Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] i386: semi-rewrite of PTRACE_PEEKUSR, PTRACE_POKEUSR [message #14261 is a reply to message #14255] |
Wed, 20 June 2007 15:53  |
Andi Kleen
Messages: 33
Registered: February 2006
|
Member |
|
|
On Wednesday 20 June 2007 17:07:34 Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> Refactor PTRACE_PEEKUSR, PTRACE_POKEUSR implementation on i386.
> Ideas and concepts borrowed from utrace patchset by Roland McGrath.
>
> Patch adds only two new concepts: struct ptrace_usr_area and struct regset.
> The former describes registers accessible through PTRACE_PEEKUSR,
> PTRACE_POKEUSR in generic way. Where it starts, where it ends, if it's a hole
> (needed to know when to return 0 and -EIO).
>
> The latter is for abstracting various registers and operations on them
> (general-purpose regs, FPU regs, etc).
>
> Unlike utrace patchset, usr_area has direct pointer to correspoding
> register set instead of magic number in specific array.
The new code seems to be larger than the old code. Not sure
how that is an improvement?
Given the old bit operations weren't very nice, but then
the code rarely changes so it wasn't exactly a maintenance issue.
-Andi
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Sep 17 13:29:25 GMT 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05117 seconds
|
OpenVZ Forum
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
