OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [PATCH] Virtual ethernet device (tunnel)
Re: [PATCH] Virtual ethernet device (tunnel) [message #12548 is a reply to message #12546] Wed, 02 May 2007 12:59 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Patrick McHardy is currently offline  Patrick McHardy
Messages: 107
Registered: March 2006
Senior Member
jamal wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-05 at 14:34 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>
>>Thats a lot better than using sysfs, but I think it would be
>>preferrable to use rtnetlink instead of genetlink for network
>>configuration.
>
>
> or you can just hold rtnl while using genl.
> I do agree it would be easier to just use rtnetlink ...


The rtnl needs to be held in either case, but using a different
netlink family introduces races in message processing. For example
a simple:

ip link add dev veth0
ip route add 10.0.0.0/8 dev veth0

might fail because we have two different input queues and the routing
message might get processed before the link message.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Templates
Next Topic: vzctl create --root and vzyum and get_veid
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Mon Aug 04 13:17:57 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 2.55855 seconds
Powered by FUDforum Powered by Virtuozzo Containers