OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » Re: [PATCH 3/7] Containers (V8): Add generic multi-subsystem API to containers
Re: [PATCH 3/7] Containers (V8): Add generic multi-subsystem API to containers [message #11874] Tue, 10 April 2007 14:44 Go to previous message
Srivatsa Vaddagiri is currently offline  Srivatsa Vaddagiri
Messages: 241
Registered: August 2006
Senior Member
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 04:32:24PM -0700, menage@google.com wrote:
> +struct container_subsys {
> + int (*create)(struct container_subsys *ss,
> + struct container *cont);
> + void (*destroy)(struct container_subsys *ss, struct container *cont);
> + int (*can_attach)(struct container_subsys *ss,
> + struct container *cont, struct task_struct *tsk);
> + void (*attach)(struct container_subsys *ss, struct container *cont,
> + struct container *old_cont, struct task_struct *tsk);
> + void (*fork)(struct container_subsys *ss, struct task_struct *task);
> + void (*exit)(struct container_subsys *ss, struct task_struct *task);
> + int (*populate)(struct container_subsys *ss,
> + struct container *cont);
> + void (*bind)(struct container_subsys *ss, struct container *root);

Is the first argument into all the callbacks, struct container_subsys *ss,
necessary?

> +struct container_subsys cpuset_subsys = {
> + .name = "cpuset",
> + .create = cpuset_create,
> + .destroy = cpuset_destroy,
> + .can_attach = cpuset_can_attach,
> + .attach = cpuset_attach,
> + .populate = cpuset_populate,
> + .subsys_id = cpuset_subsys_id,
> + .early_init = 1,
> +};

We seem to be missing a register call here as well ..

--
Regards,
vatsa
 
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: [PATCH 3/7] Containers (V8): Add generic multi-subsystem API to containers
Next Topic: /proc/*/pagemap BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Jul 16 20:32:44 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04158 seconds