OpenVZ Forum: Devel » Re: Re: [PATCHSET] 2.6.20-lxc8

Home » Mailing lists » Devel » Re: Re: [PATCHSET] 2.6.20-lxc8

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Re: [PATCHSET] 2.6.20-lxc8 [message #11383 is a reply to message #11380]

Thu, 22 March 2007 12:19

ebiederm
Messages: 1354
Registered: February 2006

Senior Member

"Denis V. Lunev" <den@sw.ru> writes:

> Kirill Korotaev wrote:
>>
>> if network device inside container has MTU higher then eth0 outside the
> container,
>> then packets will get fragmented.
>> First time to MTU1 inside container and refragmented to MTU2
>> outside the container. At least this is the reason we use ethernet MTU
>> on venet devices in OpenVZ - to avoid framentation.
>
> frankly speaking, there are another points, which can call to
> pskb_expand_head. Hard header size on container network device should be
> the same as on real one.

I believe it is the case that I have a 1500 byte mtu with an ethernet header.
Although it may be I didn't reserve extra hard header space or something like
that.

Eric

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Re: [PATCHSET] 2.6.20-lxc8 By: den on Thu, 22 March 2007 10:45
		Re: Re: [PATCHSET] 2.6.20-lxc8 By: ebiederm on Thu, 22 March 2007 12:19
		Re: Re: [PATCHSET] 2.6.20-lxc8 By: Benjamin Thery on Thu, 22 March 2007 17:57

Previous Topic:	Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy!
Next Topic:	[PATCH 2/2] Replace pid_t in autofs with struct pid reference

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Aug 30 07:41:24 GMT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.73214 seconds