OpenVZ Forum: Users » Capabilities

Home » Mailing lists » Users » Capabilities

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Re: Capabilities [message #11133 is a reply to message #11131]

Wed, 14 March 2007 10:10

dev
Messages: 1693
Registered: September 2005
Location: Moscow

Senior Member

Benny Amorsen wrote:
>>>>>>"KK" == Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru> writes:
>
>
> KK> No, it looks like you used non-OVZ config and disabled OVZ options
> KK> like CONFIG_FAIRSCHED and CONFIG_SCHED_VCPU. So compilation
> KK> failed. So this one is not related to zebra/capabilities.
>
> $ egrep '(CONFIG_FAIRSCHED|CONFIG_SCHED_VCPU)' kernel-2.6.18-x86_64-smp.config.ovz.ba
> CONFIG_SCHED_VCPU=y
> CONFIG_FAIRSCHED=y
>
> $ diff -u SOURCES/kernel-2.6.18-x86_64-smp.config.ovz SOURCES/kernel-2.6.18-x86_64-smp.config.ovz.ba
> --- SOURCES/kernel-2.6.18-x86_64-smp.config.ovz 2007-02-27 13:27:56.000000000 +0100
> +++ SOURCES/kernel-2.6.18-x86_64-smp.config.ovz.ba 2007-03-14 10:19:24.000000000 +0100
> @@ -1631,7 +1631,12 @@
> # Security options
> #
> # CONFIG_KEYS is not set
> -# CONFIG_SECURITY is not set
> +CONFIG_SECURITY=y
> +CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK=y
> +# CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM is not set
> +CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES=y
> +# CONFIG_SECURITY_ROOTPLUG is not set
> +# CONFIG_SECURITY_SECLVL is not set
Ahh... I forget that CONFIG_SECURITY automatically disables CONFIG_VE due to:
kernel/Kconfig.openvz:
config VE
bool "Virtual Environment support"
default y
depends on !SECURITY <<<< this!
So if you remove this line it should be better.

Thanks,
Kirill

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Capabilities By: Benny Amorsen on Wed, 14 March 2007 09:16
		Re: Capabilities By: dev on Wed, 14 March 2007 09:32
		Re: Capabilities By: Benny Amorsen on Wed, 14 March 2007 09:40
		Re: Re: Capabilities By: dev on Wed, 14 March 2007 09:57
		Re: Capabilities By: Benny Amorsen on Wed, 14 March 2007 09:35
		Re: Re: Capabilities By: dev on Wed, 14 March 2007 09:49
		Re: Capabilities By: Benny Amorsen on Wed, 14 March 2007 10:02
		Re: Re: Capabilities By: dev on Wed, 14 March 2007 10:10
		Re: Capabilities By: Benny Amorsen on Wed, 14 March 2007 10:20
		Re: Capabilities (solved, user stupidity) By: Benny Amorsen on Wed, 14 March 2007 10:37
		Re: Re: Capabilities (solved, user stupidity) By: kir on Wed, 14 March 2007 14:26

Previous Topic:	veth and checkpoint and restore
Next Topic:	2 interfaces on VE, each using a separate routes

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Aug 02 06:52:48 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.63345 seconds