OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [RFC][PATCH][0/4] Memory controller (RSS Control)
Re: [RFC][PATCH][1/4] RSS controller setup [message #10420 is a reply to message #10414] Mon, 19 February 2007 09:18 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Paul Menage is currently offline  Paul Menage
Messages: 642
Registered: September 2006
Senior Member
On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> This output is hard to parse and to extend. I'd suggest either two
> separate files, or multi-line output:
>
> usage: %lu kB
> limit: %lu kB

Two separate files would be the container usage model that I
envisaged, inherited from the way cpusets does things.

And in this case, it should definitely be the limit in one file,
readable and writeable, and the usage in another, probably only
readable.

Having to read a file called memctlr_usage to find the current limit
sounds wrong.

Hmm, I don't appear to have documented this yet, but I think a good
naming scheme for container files is <subsystem>.<whatever> - i.e.
these should be memctlr.usage and memctlr.limit. The existing
grandfathered Cpusets names violate this, but I'm not sure there's a
lot we can do about that.

> > +static int memctlr_populate(struct container_subsys *ss,
> > + struct container *cont)
> > +{
> > + int rc;
> > + if ((rc = container_add_file(cont, &memctlr_usage)) < 0)
> > + return rc;
> > + if ((rc = container_add_file(cont, &memctlr_limit)) < 0)
>
> Clean up the first file here?

Containers don't currently provide an API for a subsystem to clean up
files from a directory - that's done automatically when the directory
is deleted.

I think I'll probably change the API for container_add_file to return
void, but mark an error in the container itself if something goes
wrong - that way rather than all the subsystems having to check for
error, container_populate_dir() can do so at the end of calling all
the subsystems' populate methods.

Paul
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [PATCH] ecryptfs ecryptfs_read_super path_lookup errh fix
Next Topic: Re: [patch 0/1] [RFC][net namespace] veth ioctl management
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Oct 09 22:48:27 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.14153 seconds