OpenVZ Forum - RDF feed
type: channel
items: Reasonable expectations
items: Re: Reasonable expectations

Reasonable expectations
type: item
description: I've got the following hardware: CPU: 2x1.6Ghz Opteron 242 (may upgrade to a pair of 2.4Ghz dual-core 880's at some point) RAM: 8GB Dual channel DDR-400 ECC (may upgrade to 16GB at some point) Swap: 2x16GB partitions, one enabled Disks: 6x160GB 7200rpm SATA-160 on 6-channel LSI MegaRaid (64MB cache) as 800GB RAID-5 I'm running 64-bit Gentoo as the host, and will run 32-bit guest VE's (which will tend to be dynamic web sites with databases - typical hosting stuff). I'm not going to run anything besides the VE's on the host. DNS, mail, etc resides on other servers. Running vzsplit -n 75 gives me: # Configuration file generated by vzsplit for 75 VEs # on HN with total amount of physical mem 7949 Mb # low memory 7949 Mb, swap size 15264 Mb, Max treads 8000 # Resourse commit level 0: # Free resource distribution. Any parameters may be increased # Primary parameters NUMPROC="542:542" AVNUMPROC="271:271" NUMTCPSOCK="542:542" NUMOTHERSOCK="542:542" VMGUARPAGES="68214:9223372036854775807" # Secondary parameters KMEMSIZE="22229559:24452514" TCPSNDBUF="5189821:7409853" TCPRCVBUF="5189821:7409853" OTHERSOCKBUF="2594910:4814942" DGRAMRCVBUF="2594910:2594910" OOMGUARPAGES="68214:9223372036854775807" PRIVVMPAGES="409284:450212" # Auxiliary parameters LOCKEDPAGES="1085:1085" SHMPAGES="40928:40928" PHYSPAGES="0:9223372036854775807" NUMFILE="8672:8672" NUMFLOCK="867:953" NUMPTY="54:54" NUMSIGINFO="1024:1024" DCACHESIZE="4849584:4995072" NUMIPTENT="26:26" DISKSPACE="972211:1069433" DISKINODES="7880279:8668308" CPUUNITS="2105" If I understand correctly, it appears that this will give me 75 266MB VE's. I also assume that adding another 8GB of RAM (and 16GB of swap) would let me double the number of VE's to 150. However, I wonder if this is realistic. CPU, I/O, etc all factor into overall performance and potential bottlenecks aren't easy to predict (although CPU power seems an immediate concern). I'd like to hear any recommendations people might have for limits to put on this type of ser…
creator: Cliff Wells
date: 2007-12-11T21:00:04-00:00

Re: Reasonable expectations
type: item
description: Cliff Wells wrote: > I've got the following hardware: > > CPU: 2x1.6Ghz Opteron 242 (may upgrade to a pair of 2.4Ghz dual-core > 880's at some point) > RAM: 8GB Dual channel DDR-400 ECC (may upgrade to 16GB at some point) > Swap: 2x16GB partitions, one enabled > Disks: 6x160GB 7200rpm SATA-160 on 6-channel LSI MegaRaid (64MB cache) > as 800GB RAID-5 > ... > > I'd like to hear any recommendations people might have for limits to put > on this type of server. I don't expect graphs or science, just the > voice(s) of experience =) > > > 40 VPS's max is what I'd put on it. With decent load in each you could find yourself with as low as 20.
creator: TheWiseOne
date: 2007-12-11T21:07:59-00:00

Re: Reasonable expectations
type: item
description: On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 16:07 -0500, Matt Ayres wrote: > Cliff Wells wrote: > > I've got the following hardware: > > > > CPU: 2x1.6Ghz Opteron 242 (may upgrade to a pair of 2.4Ghz dual-core > > 880's at some point) > > RAM: 8GB Dual channel DDR-400 ECC (may upgrade to 16GB at some point) > > Swap: 2x16GB partitions, one enabled > > Disks: 6x160GB 7200rpm SATA-160 on 6-channel LSI MegaRaid (64MB cache) > > as 800GB RAID-5 > > ... > > > > I'd like to hear any recommendations people might have for limits to put > > on this type of server. I don't expect graphs or science, just the > > voice(s) of experience =) > > > > > > > 40 VPS's max is what I'd put on it. With decent load in each you could > find yourself with as low as 20. I think what I've settled on is to use "vzsplit -s 0 -n 100", but limit the actual number of VE's to 50. This should keep the number of actual processes reasonable and simultaneously allow me to have sufficient room to expand the resources for each VE if needed. And of course I can always go to the dual core CPUs, add another RAID card and more spindles and more RAM if needed (the additional RAM should at least help the host with caching and avoid swapping if nothing else). Thanks for the advice. Regards, Cliff
creator: Cliff Wells
date: 2007-12-12T10:53:45-00:00