Noticed one thing 104122: kmemsize 2498024 2921209 12752512 12936012 0 lockedpages 0 4 32 32 0 privvmpages 70526 76215 149152 153575 0 shmpages 12 12 8192 8192 0 dummy 0 0 0 0 0 numproc 22 28 100 100 0 physpages 59705 61738 0 2147483647 0 vmguarpages 0 0 32000 2147483647 0 oomguarpages 63196 63811 32000 2147483647 0 numtcpsock 3 16 300 300 0 numflock 3 9 100 110 0 numpty 2 2 16 16 0 numsiginfo 0 10 256 256 0 tcpsndbuf 0 149812 800000 1000000 0 tcprcvbuf 0 50280 800000 1000000 0 othersockbuf 2236 9800 132096 336896 0 dgramrcvbuf 0 8380 132096 132096 0 numothersock 4 15 150 150 0 dcachesize 0 0 1048576 1097728 0 numfile 1992 2032 2048 2048 0 dummy 0 0 0 0 0 dummy 0 0 0 0 0 dummy 0 0 0 0 0 numiptent 10 10 128 128 0 vmguarpages, oomguarpages exeeded barrier - but failcnt wasnt issued. Does it mean that failcnt for this values increases only if memory allocation fails?
UBC params with "guar" in their names are guarantees rather than limits. I suggest you to read: http://wiki.openvz.org/UBC_primary_parameters#vmguarpages http://wiki.openvz.org/UBC_secondary_parameters#oomguarpages
Yes i know that - and i read that docs many times. i just want to know the situation when failcnt for guarant params will become non-zero